![Anybody else think the new SD4000 should have been 42mm? - Page 6 - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum | Rolex watches, Rolex, Vintage watches Anybody else think the new SD4000 should have been 42mm? - Page 6 - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum | Rolex watches, Rolex, Vintage watches](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4e/b9/f5/4eb9f5d80cd344352aab25b25a4b47b6.jpg)
Anybody else think the new SD4000 should have been 42mm? - Page 6 - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum | Rolex watches, Rolex, Vintage watches
![Pls help me decide between Sea Dweller 4000 (116600) and Sea Dweller 43 (126600) | Page 2 | WatchUSeek Watch Forums Pls help me decide between Sea Dweller 4000 (116600) and Sea Dweller 43 (126600) | Page 2 | WatchUSeek Watch Forums](https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180202/bbd9f84c702782a36c6686a3cf1d2851.jpg)
Pls help me decide between Sea Dweller 4000 (116600) and Sea Dweller 43 (126600) | Page 2 | WatchUSeek Watch Forums
![The Sea-Dweller is back! Introducing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 - Monochrome Watches The Sea-Dweller is back! Introducing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 - Monochrome Watches](https://k8q7r7a2.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Rolex-Sea-dweller-116600-1.jpg)
The Sea-Dweller is back! Introducing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 - Monochrome Watches
![The Sea-Dweller is back! Introducing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 - Monochrome Watches The Sea-Dweller is back! Introducing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 - Monochrome Watches](https://k8q7r7a2.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Rolex-Sea-dweller-116600-wristshot.jpg)